News, sports, politics, blogs and forums Eden Prairie, Minnesota • (952) 942-7885

Eden Prairie, Minnesota

Keep up with the News! Sign up for email newsletters and RSS feeds.
Click to Login
No account? Sign up!

Advertising

In their own words: Jenifer Loon


» Read similar stories filed under:



Advertisement


The above clip is from an...

Back to page top

The above clip is from an Eden Prairie News interview with Loon.
We are giving each candidate approximately one minute to answer the question why EP residents should vote for them.


Submitted by Leah Shaffer on September 25, 2008 - 2:12pm.

I loved the code words!...

Back to page top

I loved the code words! Experience in helping small businesses and bring good paying jobs to Eden Prairie? Was that when she worked for the Associated Builders and Contractors trying to break unions or was that her experience as a paid lobbyist for the debt collectors association? The triumphs and challenges of public school as a parent? What does that have to do with the funding formulas for public education?

Another GOP'er wanting to squeeze more dollars from the state budget and dumping it on the taxpayer through referendums and levies.

Just not impressed.


Submitted by West Metro Dem on September 26, 2008 - 10:23am.

I want to hear more about...

Back to page top

I want to hear more about her experience as a lobbyist for the Debt Collection Industry, and her time spent breaking unions. I want to know how that experience will help her to be effective as a legislator.

This sounded like a lot of republican talking points, and Jenifer offered no specific details. Since the biggest job our next legislature will face is transportation, then how does she think she can be an effective legislator if her business experience consists of lobbying for an industry that people don't like and breaking unions?

I also am curious how the wife of a member of the National Chamber of Commerce will vote when it comes to transportation issues. The Chamber in this state endorsed the recent transportation bill against the wishes of the republican party. The "transportation 6" were all harshly treated by their party as a result. Jenifer is a republican candidate. Will she bow to the will of her party, or the will of her husband's organizational ties?

Jerry Pitzrick sounded reasonable, informed, and he offered specific solutions to issues. I like the fact that he is an engineer with his own business, and I think his background is more suited to the job.


Submitted by southwestdem on September 26, 2008 - 2:29pm.

Jenifer Loon has a great...

Back to page top

Jenifer Loon has a great website that answer many of these questions. You can check it out at: http://www.jeniferloon.com

Or you can catch her around town. She has had a number of public appearances, she goes door-to-door every day, and has had several open houses.

Or just e-mail her or give her a call.

About overriding the governor's veto, Jenifer did take a public stand against the override. The following is from her letter from last February:

Minnesota’s transportation infrastructure is inadequate and woefully in need of investment — a fact reinforced by numerous non-partisan studies and reports. The controversy has centered on how to craft a proposal to begin to address our transportation needs that is sensitive to the tax burden borne by citizens, particularly during tough economic times.

The DFL-crafted transportation bill that passed on February 21, 2008 contains numerous tax increases. It raises the gas tax by 5 cents a gallon in September, with an additional 3.5 cent hike to become effective until transportation bonds are retired. Those of us living in the seven county metropolitan area can be assessed a 0.25 percent sales tax increase for transit projects — no referendum required. Other counties can also increase their sales taxes for specific transportation projects — but only if citizens support such a move through a referendum. License tab fees would also be raised, and again, metro country residents may pay an extra $20 excise tax on new vehicles.

We need to address the congestion in the metro area, and make our state’s roads and bridges safe. However, I am frustrated by policies that treat Hennepin county and the western suburbs as an “ATM” for the rest of the state. Approximately 60 percent of the taxpayers impacted by the metro area sales tax increase in the bill live in Hennepin County—the same county that is at the bottom of the transportation funding distribution formula. Addressing this flawed formula to take into account highway usage was not part of the transportation package. Furthermore, it is fundamentally unfair to grant citizens outside the metro area referendum authority over a sales tax increase, while denying that right only to taxpayers residing inside the seven county metropolitan area. I oppose the transportation bill in its current form.

I'd like to offer you every opportunity to personally visit with me about the topics most important to you as you weigh the views and qualifications of the candidates in this race. Therefore, I will be hosting several "Meet the Candidate" open houses throughout the coming weeks. I hope you'll be able to stop by and visit with me about transportation and other important matters facing Eden Prairie and our state.

Thank you for your time and interest. Please feel free to contact me at any time with questions or to share your thoughts and opinions. I look forward to talking with you and to earning your support.

Sincerely,

Jenifer Loon
Candidate for Minnesota State Representative
District 42B
http://www.jeniferloon.com

I hope that answers your questions!

You may be also interested to know that most Minnesotans -- not just Republicans -- oppose a hike in gas taxes. According to a KSTP/Survey USA poll, most Minnesotans opposed the gas taxes and other taxes in this bill.

As you can see, at a time when most Eden Prairie families are really feeling the pinch of tighter and tighter budgets, Jenifer is the only one in this race who believes that government needs to tighten its belt as well. Jenifer -- not her tax and spend liberal opponent -- will be the clear choice to represent the views of Eden Prairie families in the legislature.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on September 26, 2008 - 11:19pm.

We had gas tax increases?...

Back to page top

We had gas tax increases? Did anyone notice?

Republicans will gather around local gas stations with protest signs and cameras to show their opposition to the higher gas prices that will be less than they were during the summer.

Democrats and many others want to start fixing our crumbling roads and breaking bridges now. For some examples:
http://www.mn2020.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BA9717E15-A925-40F5-B...

Which party is the clear choice to represent the views of Eden Prairie families?


Submitted by CentralLion on September 27, 2008 - 7:58am.

You say this is about roads...

Back to page top

You say this is about roads and that no one will notice a little tax here and there (New DFL motto: "Keep raising taxes until someone notices").

Here's where you are wrong:

LIE #1: IT’S JUST A LITTLE GAS TAX

True leadership is not getting more tax increases passed. Raising taxes is easy. Any idiot can raise taxes. True leadership is learning to live within your means. True leadership is learning how to prioritize spending.

I would be interested in hearing anything the DFL stands for that doesn’t involve raising taxes.

But it is not just a gas tax. This was a record tax increase on Minnesota families.

Among the increases:

- An additional .25 percent sales tax

- An additional $20 sales tax on motor vehicle sales

- A new $20 wheelage tax that applies to all vehicles.

- New license tab fees on car and trucks (how much did you pay last time you paid to renew your tabs?)

- When you buy a new car, you’ll also have to pay a tax that’s 1.25 percent of the purchase price.

All of that included with a gas tax that will be raised 8.5 cents by the year 2014.

LIE #2: NO ONE WILL NOTICE

I suggest that you get out more because you're sadly out of touch.

Let me share with you a comment from one taxpayer:

This new round of taxes will cost me personally a minimum of $2,500 per year. The company I work for estimates $1.8 million minimum per year. I work for a company with 450 employees and everyone here is very upset. We laid off 30 people in January now who knows. With higher fuel taxes and tab fees, the per-shipment costs will have to go up. And our customers have to absorb a higher fuel surcharge per shipment. We have been told by many customers that they will look to other manufactures and suppliers in other states because the shipping cost will be lower.

Clearly there are people who DID notice and ARE feeling the effects of these massive new taxes.

LIE #3: THERE WAS NO OTHER SOLUTION

Let's be honest: This tax increase was not about roads and bridges. This tax increase was about getting more and more and more for all of your DFL pet programs. This tax increase was about protecting the spending on education, on welfare, and on all the other things the DFL refuses to touch.

The House Republicans even submitted a proposal where we would have gotten over $7 billion for roads and bridges with no new taxes. But that is because they were directing spending to roads and bridges.

It's called PRIORITIZING. If roads and bridges are so important, then fund roads and bridges. How even one rational human can think that out of a $35 billion budget, we can't find any money for roads is incomprehensible.

LIE #4: THIS WAS ABOUT ROADS AND BRIDGES

This -- I'm sad to say -- is the biggest lie of them all.

We just raised taxes a record amount -- ALMOST NONE of the money in this bill will actually be going to roads and bridges.

It's reminiscent of that old game we all used to play with our dogs where you pretend to throw the ball and the stupid dog tears off running after the ball anyway thinking you just threw it. That is exactly what the DFL is doing to Minnesota taxpayers. Let us raise taxes -- we'll fix the roads! Woops -- ha, ha, gotcha!

What is going to happen when -- after this shameful act, the biggest single tax increase in Minnesota history -- the roads and bridges continue to fall into disrepair and traffic continues to remain congested? What will the DFL do then? Will they give the money back? Or will the DFL come back and ask for even more taxes?

Jenifer Loon was correct in opposing this bill. Her tax-and-spend liberal opponent was wrong to support it.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on September 28, 2008 - 10:08am.

You left out one important...

Back to page top

You left out one important issue, Webmaster.

Pitzrick is part of Progressive Majority - a socialist movement. Progressive Majority has picked Pitzrick as one of the several dozen candidates that it will be supporting this fall across the nation. As Progressive Majority puts it, Comrade Piztrick will be a leading voice for a "progressive tax system."

The Progressive Majority Mission Statement: "Progressive Majority's mission is to elect progressive champions. We accomplish this by identifying and recruiting the best progressive leaders to run for office; coaching and supporting their candidacies by providing strategic message, campaign, and technical support; prioritizing the recruitment and election of candidates of color; and bringing new people into the political process at all levels."

According to their website, "in 2004 we launched the Candidate Recruitment and Development Program, Progressive Majority's main vehicle to recruit, train, and elect the next generation of progressive political leaders"

Who is it that "trains" these future progressive politicians, Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin?

To all those who believe, party endorsements don't belong in local elections: Across the state Progressive Majority is endorsing five city council candidates and one school board candidate. Progressive Majority states, "we successfully ran Kim Ross in 2007, who is now a leading member of the Eden Prairie School Board." (I don't recall Ron Case or Sherry Butcher complaining back then.)

The people who cry foul (e.g. Ron Case and Sherry Butcher) when local SD42 Republicans endorse local candidates should have been up in arms when Ross was running for school board.

It is possible that Pitzrick isn't a socialist, but they sure fancy him. He's accepted their support, so voters beware. The fact that this group has already infiltrated local elections in Eden Prairie is one more reason why we need the Republican Party part to speak up.


Submitted by bigfoot on September 28, 2008 - 7:57am.

The main issue, the fact...

Back to page top

The main issue, the fact that Jenifer Loon was a professional paid lobbyist for the debt collection industry and worked to break unions had been ignored.

How does working as a lobbyist that advocated for debt collectors to be even more intrusive help us out?!

And while a person might be opposed to unions, it is quite different to actively work to break them.

Not my kind of representation.


Submitted by southwestdem on October 1, 2008 - 5:23pm.

A lot of baseless charges...

Back to page top

A lot of baseless charges there, SWDem! Let’s take them down one by one.

Yes, Jenifer did work as a lobbyist for small business. You conveniently left out her work as a legislative aid and a volunteer in the local schools and the million other things she has done.

No, she has never worked to "break up unions". In fact, she is a strong supporter of collective bargaining although she does support freedom of choice -- people should have the right to choose whether or not to join or not join a union. She has worked with both union and non-union companies.

You can say anything you want on this site but you do not get to lie. If you have evidence to back up your claim, you need to present it.

Finally, I want you to elaborate on your "debt collector" smear. What problem do you have with people being required to pay their debts? I pay my debts -- don’t you? Or do you think stealing should be legalized? (your candidate for the the U.S. house apparently does!)

How long do you think you would stay in business if you could not collect your debts? Either you would have to raise your prices (which hurts the rest of us) or you would have to close your doors. There’s no other way to go.

So now we know that Jenifer’s opponent supports the biggest tax increase in Minnesota history. He has been endorsed by Progressive Majority, one of the most radical left organizations in the country (they do not endorse “moderates” -- only radical liberals get their seal of approval).

And now we discover that one of his supporters wants businesses to be forced to give away their goods and services for free.

Three more reasons Jenifer is the better choice in 42B.

And one more: Jenifer is the ONLY candidate in this race who has stayed out of the mud. That isn't her style. Hit pieces, slime pieces, mud -- 100% of them are coming from Jenifer's opponent.

SWDem, all I can say is that you need to take the time and get to know Jenifer instead of just parroting her opponent’s slimy talking points.

Pick up the phone and call her. Email her. Stop by one of her open houses. Go up and talk to her after tomorrow night’s debate. She has been at numerous community events, high school football games, local charity events. If she knocks on your door, ask your questions. Say to her: “I heard that you hate unions -- is it true?” and listen carefully to her answer. Don’t just spend your days posting anonymous hit pieces on websites. People are sick of that stuff.

Once again, here is her website:

http://www.jeniferloon.com


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 1, 2008 - 11:00pm.

Here is some relevant...

Back to page top

Here is some relevant information on privatizing IRS debt collection and Jenifer Loon.
On private collection agencies collecting unpaid taxes:
http://tampabay.jobing.com/blog_post.asp?post=2788
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/CutYourTaxes/NewIRSTacticPriv...
2007 comments by National Taxpayer Advocate on Privatizing IRS Debt collection:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/20/pf/taxes/private_debt_collec_olson/index...
Most recent commentary on privatizing IRS debt collection:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5351530&page=1

An interesting quote from the 2006/2007 President of ACA International:
The future of our industry holds great promise as well as many challenges. Though they have been discussed many times before, I will use my last opportunity here to emphasize once again the critical importance of three key components to our industry’s continued success: Membership involvement in the politics of Washington, active state and regional units, and member commitment to higher standards of professional practices.

First, we all need to develop and maintain personal relationships with our elected representatives in Congress or we may be legislated right out of business. ACA International has many resources available to guide you through this process. All members need to support ACPAC, ACA’s political action committee, with annual contributions.
https://www.acainternational.org/collections.aspx?cid=10563

Jenifer Loon’s own words:
ACA has the opportunity to educate these new members of Congress on our industry and demonstrate that debt collection is vital to a sound economy.

Fiscal conservatives understand that everyone pays the price for uncollected debts through higher prices for goods and services. By taking the time to learn more about the governing philosophies and priorities of these new members of Congress, in addition to seeking out common ground, we can broaden our base of support across party lines.

The common sense adage that “there is no such thing as an unpaid debt” is one that defies party affiliation and embodies the reality of our financial markets and economic system.

ACA’s government affairs initiatives have grown tremendously over the past four years. By encouraging our members to be in frequent contact with their legislators, we have been able to achieve many long–sought successes for the industry. The 110th Congress will bring new challenges as we continue to work to relieve the industry of undue regulatory burdens and prevent harmful or unnecessary new proposals from being enacted.

However, while many of the players in Congress have changed, our playbook for effective grassroots action will remain largely unchanged. As always, ACA encourages industry members to meet your legislators, get to know their goals, let them know who you are as a business owner and employer in their state or district, and invite them to come and see your business. It is through these actions that relationships with elected officials are created and government affairs success is borne.
http://www.acainternational.org/collections.aspx?cid=9640


Submitted by CentralLion on October 2, 2008 - 9:20am.

Not sure if there is a...

Back to page top

Not sure if there is a question there, CL -- just a lot of rambling. Are you in debt trouble? I'm not sure what the problem is here. Do you have a bunch of debts that you don't feel like paying? Help me out here.

Incidentally, do you know what organization sends the most lobbyists to Saint Paul? Come on - take a guess. Give up?

Click here for the answer.

I did notice that in the debate tonight, Jenifer's opponent was the only one of the four candidates up there said he would consider forcing taxpayers to pay for a new stadium for the Vikings. That ought to give the hard working taxpaying families of Eden Prairie a warm feeling.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 3, 2008 - 1:49am.

SD42, you asked for evidence...

Back to page top

SD42, you asked for evidence from SWD. I gave it to help out. Check out the first 2 links. Both have connections to Jenifer Loon. I also thought the quotes were informative.

As far as the new Vikings stadium, Jerry Pitzrick said when we talk to the developers, we need to keep our hands on our wallets.


Submitted by CentralLion on October 3, 2008 - 5:54am.

The articles you supplied...

Back to page top

The articles you supplied have to with debt collection which I did NOT ask about other than to inquire what you have against a business collecting their debts.

The question is a pretty simple one really: Do you -- yes or no -- think businesses have a right to be paid for the goods and services they provide?

The other false assertion that was made above is that Jenifer hates unions or acted to break up unions. Nothing could be further from the truth. Again, if you have evidence of your assertion, you need to bring it forth. Anyone can allege anything.

As Senator Moynihan famously said: "You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to your own facts".

One more question: Have you taken the time to at least talk to Jenifer about your concerns? I think if you would put down your hatemongering and talking points for one minute and actually ask her about this, she could clear things up for you better than I could.

Again, her website: http://www.jeniferloon.com. Write her, call her, meet her for breakfast even -- I'm sure she would be glad to talk to you about this.

And if you're in debt trouble or something, she may even be able to direct you where you can get help.

Finally, I think you listened only to the beginning of Pitzrick's answer. As you said, he believes that negotiating with developers is always an adversarial relationship. You want to get it built for as cheap as possible and the developer wants to make the greatest profit possible.

But he went on to say that he would be open to the possibility of taxpayer financed stadiums if they could negotiate a good enough deal. He has the mistaken belief -- and he even said this -- that taxpayer-financed stadiums bring money into the community.

He's wrong.

The theory that multi-million dollar professional sports stadiums end up being a net plus economically has been proven wrong again and again. If you want to read up on the subject, you can check out links here and here. There have been several dozens of studies done on this -- I could give you many more links. Every study has come to the same conclusion: Stadiums benefit the team -- not the public. The team makes money -- not the public.

As I said: All three of the other candidates were unequivocal in their answers: JUST SAY NO to taxpayer subsidized stadiums! Pitzrick was the only one of the four that said he would consider it. One more reason that Jenifer Loon, not her liberal tax and spend opponent, is a better fit for the taxpayers of Eden Prairie.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 3, 2008 - 10:03pm.

I’m sorry I’m too slow...

Back to page top

I’m sorry I’m too slow for you SD42webmaster. And I'm sorry about my rambling on, too.

I do believe businesses have a right to be paid for the goods and services they provide.

Thank you for your concern, but I have no debt problems to worry about right now; I know many other people who do. It is my concern for them that makes me a strong supporter of the Democratic Party.

What I cited was relevant to support SWD on what Jenifer Loon has done as far as her work lobbying for the IRS to use private debt collectors. From what I found, that has not turned out so well, so far. There was supposed to be a final report due in August 2008, but I did not find it. I posted the latest information I could find. (http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5351530&page=1)
I would suggest you look up the final report and post it to show your candidate is correct about the value private debt collectors have for the IRS. It would be the most effective way to show I’m wrong on this issue.

I did look for support for the charge that Jenifer Loon has broken up unions, but I did not find anything, so I will not make that claim. If someone else wishes to post the relevant information to support or refute it, please go ahead. Of course, if we keep this up, I will look harder to find factual support for you.

I have not contacted Jenifer Loon because I think her valuable time is better spent reaching out to other voters rather than talking to me; it would be like you, Bigfoot, or Gino G stopping to ask Rep. Maria Ruud or Ron Case an unbiased question and giving a fair analysis of the answer.

Finally, SD42webmaster is right. We would be better off without the Minnesota Vikings. They aren’t going to get any better this season. All Viking fans should switch to support the Green Bay Packers. It doesn’t matter that their headquarters is located in Eden Prairie, where they pay Eden Prairie property taxes. And the Minnesota Twins couldn’t beat the miserable White Sox when it counted. We would be so disappointed and embarrassed if they tried to compete with the other baseball teams this postseason. Oh, wait, I misunderstood you. You were talking about the monetary value sports stadiums give to a community. Our local sports teams should either accept playing in the Metrodome or leave to another city. We don’t need the extra burden on taxpayers. We waste too much of our time talking about sports anyway. We should talk about ... the weather? Is that what Republicans stand for?

Are Republicans really for taxpayers? Or are you really for whatever interests the Republican Party? If the interest of a Republican conflicted with the interests of taxpayers, which side would SD42 GOP support?


Submitted by CentralLion on October 4, 2008 - 10:06am.

Professional sports is a...

Back to page top

Professional sports is a lucrative business and they have learned that, through extortion, threats to leave, etc. they can pretty much get what they want from their host communities. I'm sure you have seen stories about the battles that are going on across the country between taxpayers and their sports teams.

In Saint Louis, for example, the Cardinals are now suggesting that the local populace needs to supply them with an entire CAMPUS, not just a stadium. For, you see, a stadium is not enough. Not enough revenue. They need an entire shopping mall. Look for that to be part of the next wave of demands from the money-hungry sports owners.

And look for Minnesota DFLers (and fiscally irresponsible Republicans) to support it. We will get same old lines: "It's only X cents per $20 purchase!" "Vote YES for Minnesota!" "We don't want to be a cold Omaha!"

I have already shown you proof that they are a net MINUS for taxpayers -- I can provide more evidence of that if you need. What I'm trying to understand is how this squares with the supposed DFL concern for the underclass.

How can you justify taking away $1.1 billion from schools and roads and police and social programs in order to buy a stadium for a billionaire? How can you justify taking money away from a taxi driver who is working 60 hours a week just to feed and house his family -- and giving it to Carl Pohlad?

Team owners are demanding stadiums that are designed to generate the maximum profit. So they now have more and more luxury boxes. How many working class taxpayers will ever see the inside of these luxury boxes?

How is this going to help these people you say you know who are in debt and are, by your own admission, the reason you are a Democrat?

And how can you justify not even allowing people to vote on the issue? Every poll taken -- even ones taken by the liberal Star Tribune -- showed that if the Twins Stadium had gone to a referendum, it would have been soundly defeated (part of the reason, in my opinion, Neil Peterson was thrown out of office in Bloomington a month ago).

So, yes, especially on this issue, I believe someone like Jenifer Loon is more of a populist, much more representative of the will of Eden Prairie families, than her liberal tax and spend opponent.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 6, 2008 - 12:27am.

Ok - You can’t answer my...

Back to page top

Ok - You can’t answer my question about paying debts. You can’t answer my question about unions. And you don’t seem to understand Pitzrick’s position on taxpayer-financed stadiums. So far, you're zero for three.

Let’s try another issue: nuclear energy.

The question was asked whether or not the candidates support lifting Minnesota’s moratorium against nuclear power. Pitzrick chose not to answer the question. Actually, to be fair, none of the candidates answered it although Shari May said something about supporting nuclear.

The moderator requested, however, that the candidates stick around after the debate so people could have the opportunity ask them questions directly. So they were each asked about the nuclear moratorium again -- here are their answers:

Do you support lifting the moratorium on nuclear energy in Minnesota?

Shari May (R-42A): YES

Jenifer Loon (R-42B): YES

Maria Ruud (D-42A): I don’t know.

Jerry Pitzrick (D-42B) -- WOOPS! Jerry didn’t answer. Jerry didn't stick around like he was asked. As soon as the debate was over, Jerry shot out the door. I guess he can’t be bothered with silly things like talking with constituents.

The truth is that Jerry Pitzrick is a fraud. He is endorsed by Clean Water Action -- ever hear of that group? It's another far-left fringe group. Let’s see . . . Jenifer's opponent is endorsed by Clean Water Action, Progressive Majority . . . are you noticing a pattern here?

His literature uses terms like "independent voice" and "non-partisan". Yeah right! Didn't anyone ever inform him that you're judged by the company you keep?

Clean Water Action vehemently opposes nuclear energy. So it is no wonder why Maria and Jerry refuse to answer this question.

Read more about last night’s League of Women Voters debate here.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 4, 2008 - 12:08am.

SD42WM, it is interesting to...

Back to page top

SD42WM, it is interesting to note you support your claim of left-wing bias with the PipeLineNews.org, whose promotional line is “The RIGHT News…RIGHT Now”. The only mention of “Clean Water Action” in the article you cite is among a list of “organizations noted below are also integral components within the Clinton/Soros thugocracy” as proclaimed by PipeLineNews.org.

As far as the issue of nuclear energy, I think we all agree safety and secure disposal of nuclear waste is most important. With any serious nuclear incident, all the energy generated does not make up for a disaster. We need guarantees of safe energy production and proper and guarded disposal for nuclear waste. Also, because it takes a lot of money to construct a new nuclear energy plant and to store the waste byproduct, there are questions about cost effectiveness versus other potential energy options. If you wish to write to inform people and to address these concerns, please do.


Submitted by CentralLion on October 4, 2008 - 11:01am.

CL, do you deny that "Clean...

Back to page top

CL, do you deny that "Clean Water Action" has a left-wing bias?

If your denial is based on the source source that webmaster used, here's an ultra-left source for you - Wikipedia - which states "Clean Water Action organizes grassroots groups and coalitions to solve environmental and community pollution problems, and campaigns to elect progressive and pro-environment candidates at every level." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Water_Action

In case you didn't notice, "progressive" is code for socialist-democrat. That makes (at least) two of these socialist groups that are endorsing Jerry Pitzrick, the other is Progressive Majority.

Like many of these enivronmental activist groups, the ultimate goal of Clean Water Action is to elect socialist-democrats to office, any supposed environmental cause is secondary.


Submitted by bigfoot on October 4, 2008 - 5:25pm.

What I need in order to pass...

Back to page top

What I need in order to pass judgment about Clean Water Action is information that clearly states they are more interested in politics than in cleaning up the environment. This would be more than giving a simple citation from a right-wing or left-wing website.

I would expect similar support against Progressive Majority.

If all you have is labels like “liberal,” “progressive,” or “socialist,” then you don’t have anything.


Submitted by CentralLion on October 4, 2008 - 10:37pm.

CL, I'll be glad to provide...

Back to page top

CL, I'll be glad to provide proof for you. There are a couple of ways to identify if an organization is left, right, or center.

First of all, who do they endorse?

If you look at Clean Water Action's website, you discover that they endorse almost 100% liberal Democrats. Likewise, Progressive Majority endorses only Democrats (duh -- it's even in their name -- they are trying to achieve a progressive (ie. socialist, leftist) majority. These are not conservative groups.

A second way to tell where a group is coming from is to see what other organization they like to pal around with. If you Google "Clean Water Action" and "Progressive organizations", you will find events and coalitions that Clean Water Action is affiliated with. Groups like Naral, MoveOn.Org, Socialist Party USA, and the notorious Acorn who has been cited in several voter fraud cases trying to register nonexistent voters for Democrats.

The third way to tell which way an organization leans is to see what they support. Progressive Majority requires that people they endorse get 100 percent right on their questionnaire -- all very liberal policies. Clean Water Action also has an agenda -- no nuclear power, cap and trade that will cripple our state's economy.

These are far left organizations.

But it's okay. If Pitzrick would just come out and say: Hey, I'm a far-left wacko -- I would forgive him. I have friends who are liberal - there's nothing wrong with that. But instead he chooses to lie. On his literature he says he is "open-minded" and "non-partisan". On his website he says he HATES taxes.

No he doesn't-- he LOVES taxes. He LOVES bigger government. But he doesn't want the voters to know that.

Jenifer Loon is a fiscal conservative and that is why she is a better fit for this district than someone who is supported by radical far-left organizations.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 6, 2008 - 5:30pm.

On the Clean Water Action...

Back to page top

On the Clean Water Action home page, I see links to information about protecting America’s waters, global warming, new energy economy, making healthier and safer communities and making democracy work. On the home page, there are links to stories about rocket fuel in drinking water, fighting drugs in drinking water, defending the Clean Water Restoration Act, and energy issues. There is a link for recommendations in the 2008 elections, but it appears it is not their primary purpose. Their primary purpose seems to be focused on cleaner water in our environment.
http://www.cleanwateraction.org/

Here is the link to national site for Progressive Majority:
http://www.progressivemajority.org/
To me, Progressive Majority appears to be about electing people who will bring prosperity to everyone, protect civil rights, get everyone affordable quality health care, invest in quality public education, and protect our environment. Progressive Majority sounds like it is for progress in our country.

People should decide for themselves what they think about these organizations.


Submitted by CentralLion on October 6, 2008 - 9:32pm.

In order to believe that,...

Back to page top

In order to believe that, you would have to believe that there are no Republicans who want healthy and safe communities or safe drinking water or want to make democracy work.

You would have to believe that every Republican on the planet wants health care to be unaffordable.

You would have to believe Air America is just mainstream radio and Karl Marx was just a philosopher.

These organizations are hostile to Republicans. They do not endorse Republicans. And they affiliate themselves with other groups that are hostile to Republicans.

Pitzrick embraces his endorsements by these groups but then turns around and describes himself in his literature as "NON-PARTISAN".

Who is kidding whom?


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 6, 2008 - 11:21pm.

"I think we all agree safety...

Back to page top

"I think we all agree safety and secure disposal of nuclear waste is most important."

I don't pretend to be a nuclear expert but I think the short term solution is Yucca Mountain (http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym_repository/index.shtml). I think the greatest risk is the transport of the waste to the site. The solution to that is the development of extremely secure transport vehicles and military escort.

If research efforts do not produce a viable alternative to traditional nuclear fission for a long term solution, then we need seriously to consider some solutions that sound like sci-fi today. One might be to use space elevators (http://www.spaceelevator.com/) to increase the safety and lower the cost of getting the nuclear waste to space for ultimate delivery into the sun. Another would be to put the nuclear facilities themselves in orbit (not around the Earth so as not to risk a catastrophic accident, but in Earth-trailing heliocentric orbit) or on the moon.

BTW, I am in 42A so will not be able to cast a vote for Jenifer, but to me, she is as near to the perfect candidate as one could hope for. The only downside to her winning this office is that the office is not high enough for her and she will surely be moving upwards soon. I may write her name in for US Senator. :)


Submitted by William Wood on October 4, 2008 - 1:27pm.

WW, you may not be a nuclear...

Back to page top

WW, you may not be a nuclear expert, but you are smart and practical.
Keep writing.

Yucca Mountain has some concerns, like earthquakes and transportation of the waste through populated areas. It is, so far, the best of some not-so-great choices. People should be reassured these concerns are addressed by our government.

Shooting the waste into space worries me more than Yucca Mountain. One bad launch can spread radioactive material over a large area. It would definitely solve the storage issue, but I would want more reassurance as far as safety.

I wonder about the use of the tides or hydrogen to create energy. There needs to be more research to make them cost effective and make hydrogen use safe.

As far as the political races, good luck to you and the candidates you support. I'll keep working for my candidates.


Submitted by CentralLion on October 4, 2008 - 2:20pm.

CL, look at the graph on...

Back to page top

CL, look at the graph on this page:

http://www.shotinthedark.info/wp/?p=939

and then think about this: Minnesota is the only state that completely prohibits new nuclear power plants. We are currently prohibited from even considering it.

Minnesota currently has three operating nuclear power plants. Without those three plants, your heating costs this winter would be higher, the air you breath would be much dirtier, and the economy that provides you a job to go to every day would be weaker.

One candidate in this race -- Jenifer Loon -- is in favor of lifting that moratorium.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 4, 2008 - 8:29pm.

In the 1970's, America first...

Back to page top

In the 1970's, America first faced being held hostage by Arab Oil Producers. Remember gas lines? I do. And I also remember President Jimmy Carter saying we were being held hostage, and had to do something. At the White House, President Carter turned down the thermostat, put on a carigan sweater, and installed solar panels on the roof.

In 1977, President Carter also proposed a bold Energy Plan to reduce the stranglehold foreign oil producers could exert on America.

So, what happened?

In 1980, Ronald Reagan was elected. Reagan moved into the White House, took his jacket off, turned up the heat, and ripped the solar panels off the roof.

Republicans have never been serious about alternative energy; they like oil and lots of it. Republicans like Nuclear because it has a huge price tag, but actually - once construction is over - employs few people.

In 1999, Germany enacted a 100,000 Roofs program - installing solar panels on 100,000 roofs. They had them by 2003, and it's been widely sucessful. And now, the cutting edge in solar isn't here, in the good ol' USofA, it's elsewhere. Thanks to Republican policies.

Today, there's a wind turbine blade plant in South West Minnesota; it's owned by a company from India.. A wind farm is being built in Sout West Minnesota; it's being built by a French company. A gear box manufacturer serving the wind maket is going to open in Faribault - the company is Finnish, not American. More thanks to Republican policies.

Today, the stock market opens below 10,000; it first went above 10,000 in 1999. Republicans have had control of The White House and Congress most of this decade; this decade has shown no economic growth - agan, thanks to Republican policies.

The failed Republican experiment is over, Peter. It's time for America for Americans. And that means solar, wind, and other alternative energy policies BEFORE nuclear energy - not after.


Submitted by twoputttommy on October 7, 2008 - 7:27am.

We finally got a response...

Back to page top

We finally got a response from Pitzrick on the nuclear moratorium. He said:

"I would support lifting the moratorium on new nuclear power plants provided there is no additional above ground storage of waste at the Prairie Island Facility or in similar situations. The nuclear waste at Prairie Island is located in a floodplain along the Mississippi River. This is a risk that could be managed much more effectively."

Looks like even your own candidate has abandoned you on this one, Tommy.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 7, 2008 - 8:16am.

Mr. Pitzrick is his own man,...

Back to page top

Mr. Pitzrick is his own man, Peter - and he's not my candidate. But, thanks for pointing out that DFL Candidates don't have to march lock-step with Party Ideology, as do GOP Candidates.


Submitted by twoputttommy on October 7, 2008 - 9:56am.

Oh my goodness, Tommy, I...

Back to page top

Oh my goodness, Tommy, I wish that were true.

The Republican Party has always stood for limited government, economic freedom, and personal liberty. But Republican LEGISLATORS often do not. Professional sports stadiums, medicare part D, bridges to nowhere, and massive bank bailouts -- are not examples of smaller government.

So -- I wish you were right -- about the Republican candidates being true to conservative ideology, but too often (and sadly) it is not true.

Maybe someday.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 7, 2008 - 4:45pm.

Putt Putt, you stated:...

Back to page top

Putt Putt, you stated: "Today, the stock market opens below 10,000; it first went above 10,000 in 1999. Republicans have had control of The White House and Congress most of this decade; this decade has shown no economic growth - agan [sic], thanks to Republican policies."

By "stock market", do you mean the Dow Jones Industrial Average? Did you know that on January 4, 2007 - when the current Democratically controlled House and Senate took office - the DJIA was 25 percent higher than it is now?

If you want to point partisan fingers, then you should be blaming the likes of Pelosi, Obama, Biden and Klobuchar - and Democratic policies.


Submitted by bigfoot on October 7, 2008 - 9:02am.

bigfoot, the simple facts...

Back to page top

bigfoot, the simple facts that you're ignoring, is the Republicans held the US House from 1994 to 1996. They held the Senate almost as long. You had the Presidency, in the form of Bush The Lesser, who never veto'd a spending bill sent to him by Republican Lawmakers.

You can spin it all you want, but the problems in today's economy are the results of Republican policies, actions, and inactions. Period.

Reasonable people understand that, and that's why the electorate is going to reject republiconism on November 4th.


Submitted by twoputttommy on October 7, 2008 - 9:47am.

SD42webmaster, you are right...

Back to page top

SD42webmaster, you are right again. We need the state to build a billion dollar nuclear reactor. Never mind the deficit our state and our country faces next year. Let’s build it in Eden Prairie and boost our local economy. No one else in the state will want it because they’re all wimpy NIMBYs (Not in My Backyard). Aren’t there a few buildings in Eden Prairie you would like to see replaced with something useful? Anyone who complains about it is not supportive of economic growth in Eden Prairie or Minnesota.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: CentralLion is crazy. But consider this: a person thought of as “crazy” by some, is called a “maverick” by others.


Submitted by CentralLion on October 4, 2008 - 10:56pm.

I don't want a power plant...

Back to page top

I don't want a power plant in my backyard any more than I want a factory in my backyard. Should we then close all the factories?

Just for the record, I wouldn't want an ethanol plant or a wind farm or a light rail line in my backyard either.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 5, 2008 - 10:31am.

Now, SD42webmaster doesn’t...

Back to page top

Now, SD42webmaster doesn’t want a nuclear plant. Oh, wait, not in your backyard. But you’d be okay with building it in someone else’s backyard. Right. The state of Minnesota has a land area of 79,617 square miles. How close should a nuclear plant be to your backyard for you to be comfortable?

By the way, what does a nuclear plant cost to build? I guessed at a billion dollars, but with our economy, the need for the latest safety features, the cost for waste disposal, etc. I think it could be more than that. Where are we going to get that money? Shall we borrow it? In this economy?

No, to find some extra money, let’s close down our social services programs. Let’s end unemployment benefits, Medicare, and Medicaid. If people want handouts, they should go to churches and charities, not the government. Is this what Republicans stand for?


Submitted by CentralLion on October 5, 2008 - 1:02pm.

Yes, that's what Republican...

Back to page top

Yes, that's what Republican Party LEADERSHIP stands for. Only, they just won't say that.

Locally, Brad, Jon and Phil want to get rid of the Smith Douglas More House. But, they're simply not honest enough to tell you how they plan to do it.


Submitted by twoputttommy on October 5, 2008 - 1:10pm.

No -- what I said is I don't...

Back to page top

No -- what I said is I don't want ANY powerplant in my backyard.

Of course I don't want a nuclear plant in my backyard! Who would? And I don't want a coal plant or a wind farm or a hydroelectric plant or a factory or an ethanol plant or a light rail line or stockyard or ....

So -- unless you are willing to close ALL power plants, factories ... or anything else we don't particularly want in our backyards -- your argument doesn't really hold water.

Try again.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 5, 2008 - 2:04pm.

So, SD42webmaster...

Back to page top

So, SD42webmaster says:

“…I don't want ANY powerplant in my backyard. Of course I don’t want a nuclear plant in my backyard! Who would?...”

Is SD42webmaster and the SD42 GOP now supporting Minnesota’s moratorium against nuclear power? Because that would ensure no nuclear plants are built in any Minnesotan’s backyard.


Submitted by CentralLion on October 5, 2008 - 4:01pm.

CL, you are on about the...

Back to page top

CL, you are on about the same intellectual level as "I know you are what am I". Move on to your next attack because you've exhausted the humor of this one.


Submitted by sd42webmaster on October 5, 2008 - 7:00pm.

"We need the state to build...

Back to page top

"We need the state to build a billion dollar nuclear reactor."

Not sure about SD42, but my support of nuclear does not go so far as having the government build the plants. Clearly, they should be private enterprises with government regulation.

As far as having a nuclear plant in my backyard, I guess I can claim to have had that experience (since I'm a carpetbagger :) -- I lived near the San Onofre power plant (http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/PowerGeneration/SanOnofreNuclearG...) when I attended UC Irvine and lived in San Diego. Interestingly, San Onofre is just a few miles from San Clemente, home to President Nixon. (Here's a link to the "left leaning" Wikipedia (good gried, how can a site created and maintained by the people be left-leaning??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Clemente,_California). The demographics look a LOT like Eden Prairie. The plant is also right next to San Onofre State Beach, the 5th most visited state park in California. Is proximity to a power plant a big concern for the park? No. The big issue there is a proposed Toll Road! (http://www.savesanonofre.com/)

So would I mind having a nuclear plant nearby? Not really, especially if it meant Minnesota could produce ALL of its own electricity needs cleanly.


Submitted by William Wood on October 5, 2008 - 6:11pm.

Obama and terrorists: Palin...

Back to page top

Obama and terrorists:
Palin Accuses Obama of 'Palling Around With Terrorists'
Sarah Palin takes a swipe at Barack Obama for his ties to Bill Ayers, founder of a 1960s radical group.
Sarah Palin, using some of her strongest language to date to question the character of the Democratic presidential nominee, accused Barack Obama on Saturday of "palling around with terrorists."

Palin, speaking at a closed fundraiser in Colorado, was referencing Obama's ties to Bill Ayers, a founder of the 1960s radical group The Weather Underground. That relationship was examined in a front-page article in The New York Times on Saturday.

"This is not a man who sees America as you see America, and as I see America," Palin said. "Our opponent, though, is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect -- imperfect enough that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country. Americans need to know this. ... I think, OK we gotta get the word out. This is in fairness to the electorate we gotta start telling people what the other side represents."

The Times article she mentioned concluded that Obama and Ayers did not appear to be close.

Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan released a statement in response accusing McCain's campaign of launching "Swiftboat-like attacks in hopes of deflecting attention from the nation's economic ills."

He said the Times article made clear that Obama and Ayers were not close, "much less 'pals'."

Ayers' group took credit for bombings, including nonfatal explosions at the Pentagon and the U.S. Capitol four decades ago.

Ayers now is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He and Obama live in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood and served together on the board of the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based charity that develops community groups to help the poor. Obama left the board in December 2002, and he has denounced Ayers' past activities.

The McCain campaign has indicated it will step up its attacks on Obama's character and judgment in the final month of campaigning.

Palin, for instance, said on Friday that some of Obama's statements on America's foreign policy should disqualify him from being president.

"Some of his comments that he has made about the war that I think may -- in my world -- disqualifies someone from consideration as the next commander in chief," Palin told FOX News. "Some of his comments about Afghanistan and what we are doing there, supposedly just air-raiding villages and killing civilians. That's reckless."

She was referring to Obama's remarks last summer about Afghanistan in which he said: "We've got to get the job done there and that requires us to have enough troops that we're not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians which is causing enormous problems there."

Republicans lashed out at him at the time, though the Associated Press published a fact-check shortly afterward that showed, by their count at the time, Western forces had killed 286 civilians in the country, compared with 231 killed by militants in 2007.

The escalated effort to question Obama's character dovetails with TV ads by outside groups questioning Obama's ties to Ayers, convicted former Obama fundraiser Antoin "Tony" Rezko and Obama's former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

McCain adviser Nancy Pfotenhauer followed up on both of Palin's remarks Saturday, citing Obama's Afghanistan comments and ties to Ayers in questioning his judgment.

"Apparently Senator Obama has no problem associating with someone like that, and somehow thinks that this unrepentant terrorist is rehabilitated," she told FOX News.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/04/palin-accuses-obama-palling-terr...


Submitted by Gino G on October 5, 2008 - 8:50pm.

Palin Wins Posted on October...

Back to page top

Palin Wins
Posted on October 2, 2008

Frank Luntz focus group was overwhelmingly in agreement that Palin won this debate. She was confident, and totally blew the lid off the frame the media tried to put around her neck. She connected with the American people, and folks felt her energy was refreshing. The Drudge poll says 75 to 25 in her favor. AJ Strata is asking for a job in the administration. It went good for Sarah! ****** Morris Just Said Palin has connected in a Way not Seen Since Reagan!

Red Stater:

Even democrat strategist Kirsten Powers and liberal pundit Mort Kondracki gave the debate to Sarah Palin. Kondracki said… “She connected with the average American while Joe Biden talked in Senate-speak”.
Powers said… “Biden didn’t commit any major gaffe’s, but she (Palin) got the better of it.”

The Frank Luntz focus group comprised of independents half of whom voted for John Kerry in 2004, overwhelmingly said Palin won the debate. While a dozen or more said Palin changed their minds and they now support McCain, only one person in the group said he changed his mind in support of Obama.

Sleepy Eyed Whiners: Sarah Rocked Again!

Don Surber:

The moose hunter bags another one.

Biden has veered off the facts into Daily Kos land. Biden saying Republican John McCain was wrong on the war.

Two words: The Surge.

Palin has sliced this guy bad. She shows he knows nothing about energy, the economy and the war. Every answer he has is Bush, Bush, Bush.

He’s scripted. She’s not.

Biden’s lying. She’s not.

I don’t know if she can still save McCain, but she got game.

Line of the night: Doggone it, Joe.
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/10/02/frank-luntz-group-palin-w...


Submitted by Gino G on October 5, 2008 - 8:55pm.

Obama Illegal...

Back to page top

Obama Illegal contributions?
Republicans to file complaint against Obama
GOP alleges the Democratic candidate accepted illegal contributions
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27038128/
Smells like a duck, is a duck.

WASHINGTON - The Republican National Committee plans to file a fundraising complaint against Democrat Barack Obama's presidential campaign Monday, alleging it has accepted donations that exceed federal limits as well as illegal contributions from foreigners.

RNC officials acknowledged Sunday that they do not have a list of foreign donors to Obama's campaign. Instead, the complaint is based largely on media reports, including one from a conservative Web site.

The complaint asks the Federal Elections Commission to audit Obama's campaign fund, RNC chief counsel Sean Cairncross said in a conference call with reporters.
Story continues below ↓advertisement

Cairncross said little is known about many of Obama's donors because the campaign is not required to disclose detailed information about people who give less than $200.

The Obama campaign, which is not accepting public funds, has raised more than $468 million. About half has come from small donors, a point of pride for the Obama campaign.

The Obama campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Submitted by Gino G on October 5, 2008 - 9:06pm.

Obama Bomber AGAIN? The...

Back to page top

Obama Bomber AGAIN?
The crossed paths of Obama and ’60s bomber
By Scott Shane
updated 9:49 a.m. CT, Sat., Oct. 4, 2008

CHICAGO - At a tumultuous meeting of anti-Vietnam War militants at the Chicago Coliseum in 1969, Bill Ayers helped found the radical Weathermen, launching a campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and United States Capitol.

Twenty-six years later, at a lunchtime meeting about school reform in a Chicago skyscraper, Barack Obama met Mr. Ayers, by then an education professor. Their paths have crossed sporadically since then, at a coffee Mr. Ayers hosted for Mr. Obama’s first run for office, on the schools project and a charitable board, and in casual encounters as Hyde Park neighbors.

Their relationship has become a touchstone for opponents of Mr. Obama, the Democratic senator, in his bid for the presidency. Video clips on YouTube, including a new advertisement that was broadcast on Friday, juxtapose Mr. Obama’s face with the young Mr. Ayers or grainy shots of the bombings.
In a televised interview last spring, Senator John McCain, Mr. Obama’s Republican rival, asked, “How can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings that could have or did kill innocent people?”

More recently, conservative critics who accuse Mr. Obama of a stealth radical agenda have asserted that he has misleadingly minimized his relationship with Mr. Ayers, whom the candidate has dismissed as “a guy who lives in my neighborhood” and “somebody who worked on education issues in Chicago that I know.”

A review of records of the schools project and interviews with a dozen people who know both men, suggest that Mr. Obama, 47, has played down his contacts with Mr. Ayers, 63. But the two men do not appear to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers, whom he has called “somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8.”

Obama campaign aides said the Ayers relationship had been greatly exaggerated by opponents to smear the candidate.

Video
Chuck Todd does the delegate math
Oct. 3: NBC's Political Director Chuck Todd assesses the impact of the vice presidential debate.

Nightly News
“The suggestion that Ayers was a political adviser to Obama or someone who shaped his political views is patently false,” said Ben LaBolt, a campaign spokesman. Mr. LaBolt said the men first met in 1995 through the education project, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, and have encountered each other occasionally in public life or in the neighborhood. He said they have not spoken by phone or exchanged e-mail messages since Mr. Obama began serving in the United States Senate in January 2005 and last met more than a year ago when they bumped into each other on the street in Hyde Park.

In the stark presentation of a 30-second advertisement or a television clip, Mr. Obama’s connections with a man who once bombed buildings and who is unapologetic about it may seem puzzling. But in Chicago, Mr. Ayers has largely been rehabilitated.

Federal riot and bombing conspiracy charges against him were dropped in 1974 because of illegal wiretaps and other prosecutorial misconduct, and he was welcomed back after years in hiding by his large and prominent family. His father, Thomas G. Ayers, had served as chief executive of Commonwealth Edison, the local power company.

Since earning a doctorate in education at Columbia in 1987, Mr. Ayers has been a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, the author or editor of 15 books, and an advocate of school reform.

“He’s done a lot of good in this city and nationally,” Mayor Richard M. Daley said in an interview this week, explaining that he has long consulted Mr. Ayers on school issues. Mr. Daley, whose father was Chicago’s mayor during the street violence accompanying the 1968 Democratic National Convention and the so-called Days of Rage the following year, said he saw the bombings of that time in the context of a polarized and turbulent era.
SCARY STUFF
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27018244/


Submitted by Gino G on October 5, 2008 - 9:09pm.

Obama/...

Back to page top

Obama/ Rezko/Ayers/Wright
The conservative Judicial Confirmation Network is running a TV ad tying Obama to not just Rezko, but William Ayers (now using cartoons to spread his ideas) and the bombastic Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

"We don't know who Barack Obama would choose" as a Supreme Court justice, the ad says, "but we know this. He chose as one of his first financial backers a slumlord now convicted on 16 counts of corruption. Obama chose as an associate a man who helped to bomb the Pentagon and said he 'didn't do enough.' And Obama chose as his pastor a man who has blamed America for the 9/11 attacks."
Tony Rezko is not your typical middle American.
He’s Antoin Rezko, Muslim from Syria.
It is positively amazing, Guiness World Record worthy to note

How many times Obama’s path has accidentally stumbled upon Muslims.
His father and stepfather.
His half sister Maya , daughter of Lolo Soetoro, Indonesian Muslim.
All his college roommates were Muslims.
Both at Columbia and at Occidental College.
The same group of Muslims shepherded Obama on his grand tour of Pakistan.
His Kenyan relatives and those he campaigned for in Kenya-Raila Odingo.
And his financial patron-Antoin Rezko.
And that’s just the Arab Muslims.
The Black Muslims are another chapter.
As are ACORN and domestic terrorists.
Watch the video here:
http://www.theodoresworld.net/archives/2008/10/ad_about_obama_rezkoayers...


Submitted by Gino G on October 5, 2008 - 9:31pm.

McCain - He IS the problem....

Back to page top

McCain - He IS the problem. McCain was in it up to his neck, as part of The Keating Five, as de-regulation resulted in The Savings And Loan Collapse.

And here's the YouTube with the former Federal Banking Regulator, talking about John McCain's role in The Keating Five and the S&L crisis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDofbll86dY&feature=iv&annotation_id=even...


Submitted by twoputttommy on October 8, 2008 - 6:47am.

THE PRO-BARACK VOTE-FRAUD...

Back to page top

THE PRO-BARACK VOTE-FRAUD DRIVE
Posted: 4:34 am
October 8, 2008

SYSTEMIC corruption of our election process continues. Barack Obama and his old friends at ACORN and Project Vote are leading the way. This radical revolution is taking place in your backyard. And as I've reported before, this voter-fraud racket is on your dime.

On Monday, the two groups announced the wrap-up of a 21-state voter-registration drive targeting low-income people and minorities in such battleground states as Ohio, Pennyslvania, Colorado, Florida, New Mexico and Wisconsin.

What's wrong with that? For starters, these two groups are militantly partisan outfits purporting to engage in nonpartisan activity. And their campaign comes amid an avalanche of fresh voter-fraud allegations involving ACORN in many of those same states.

ACORN has helped register over 1.27 million people nationwide. It gets 40 percent of its revenues from the taxpayers, with the rest coming from left-wing heavyweights like billionaire George Soros and the Democracy Alliance.

Lefty lawyer Sandy Newman founded Project Vote, a 501(c)(3) organization, to register voters in welfare offices and unemployment lines with the explicit goal of turning back the Reagan revolution.

The two groups are inextricably linked - and at their nexus is Barack Obama. Despite his denials of any association with the group, Obama's political DNA is encoded with the ACORN agenda.

As I've noted previously ("ACORN: O's Ugly Ally," June 26), Obama trained ACORN members in Chicago. In turn, ACORN volunteers worked on his Illinois campaigns and ACORN's PAC endorsed him in this year's Democratic primaries back in February.

And Newman hired Obama in 1992 to lead Project Vote efforts in Illinois. The effort's motto: "It's a Power Thing." Today, the Obama campaign's "Vote for Change" registration drive is running in parallel with ACORN/Project Vote, targetting the same sorts of people.

It's an all-out scramble to scrape up every last unregistered voter sympathetic to Obama's big-government vision. "Our volume," Obama campaign manager David Plouffe bragged of the voter-registration program, "is going to be enormous."

Quantity over quality. That's the ACORN way - and the fraud allegations keep piling up:

* Yesterday, Nevada officials raided ACORN's Las Vegas office after election authorities accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with fake and duplicate names. Among the bogus monikers: names of former Dallas Cowboys players.

* Lake County, Ind., election officials this month rejected thousands of registration forms ACORN had turned in from its drives this summer. On a conference call yesterday, GOP officials noted that up to 11,000 of the applications were no good - tying up election officials and jeopardizing the voting rights of untold victims whose identities may have been stolen.

In what seems to be ACORN's standard operating procedure, vote canvassers had pulled names and addresses from phone books and forged signatures. According to a local paper (the Northwest Indiana and Illionois Times), "Large numbers of voter registration forms bore signatures all in the same apparent handwriting style" and "apparently the organization's canvassers broke rules to meet ACORN-set voter registration quotas to get paid." The fake registrants include dead people and underage kids.

* Milwaukee, Wisc., officials last month discovered at least seven felons employed as voter-registration workers for ACORN and another affiliated group. (State law bans felons from such work.) They also uncovered a raft of problematic voter-registration cards. The state GOP accuses the group of trying to get dead, imprisoned or imaginary people on the voter rolls. Fraud has plagued ACORN's Milwaukee chapter since the last election cycle.

* In Florida, in Orange County alone, ACORN workers turned in multiple, copycat forms for six separate voters over the summer. The Miami Herald reports: "One individual had 21 duplicate applications."

Election officials had flagged ACORN's negligent practices months ago. But it may be too late: In Orange, Broward and Miami-Dade counties, ACORN has signed up 135,000 new voters, nearly 60