Erik Paulsen has consistently sided with Big Oil to oppose tough measures to fight Global Warming and promote energy independence.

Paulsen voted:
NO to Minnesota's participation in a regional greenhouse gas reduction program. [1]
NO to requiring that 20 percent of Minnesota's energy be produced from renewable sources by 2020. [2]
NO to requiring that renewable energy make up a minimum share of the electricity sold by utilities. [3]

In announcing his Energy Plan on August 8th, Paulsen focused almost exclusively on developing renewable energy.

Ashwin Madia is emphatic that we must change our economic policy in this country. The era of “borrow and spend”, ushered in by the Bush Administration must end. The Congress must return to the basic financial concept of “pay as you go”, meaning that every spending proposal must be matched to specific revenue sources or spending cuts. This method was instrumental in creating a federal budget surplus in the late 1990s.

The fact that Ashwin volunteered to join the United States Marine Corps after attending law school says a lot about his character. As a young lawyer, primed for a high paying position at a top law firm, he could have opted for the money. But instead, he became a Marine, and spent 4 years serving our country proudly. For that, he deserves our gratitude.

If you like Michelle Bachmann, you are gonna LOVE Erik Paulsen.

2 peas in a pod.

Let's be honest here... compared to Erik Paulsen's far right agenda, Ashwin Madia is far more moderate, you know... Ash is more like Congressman Ramstad:

* Emphatic to Balance the Budget (Erik/Pawlenty = Borrow & Spend)
* Strong on Women's Issues
* Tolerant and Inclusive (Erik = Condemn those not "one of us")
* Government should not govern a citizen's private life
* Government should not add discrimination to the MN Constitution
* Fights for Seniors (Erik = No bidding on Prescription Drugs)

If you like Michelle Bachmann, you are gonna LOVE Erik Paulsen.

2 peas in a pod.

Let's be honest here... compared to Erik Paulsen's far right agenda, Ashwin Madia is far more moderate, you know... Ash is more like Congressman Ramstad:

* Emphatic to Balance the Budget (Erik/Pawlenty = Borrow & Spend)
* Strong on Women's Issues
* Tolerant and Inclusive (Erik = Condemn those not "one of us")
* Government should not govern a citizen's private life
* Government should not add discrimination to the MN Constitution
* Fights for Seniors (Erik = No bidding on Prescription Drugs)

Erik Paulsen has consistently sided with Big Oil to oppose tough measures to fight Global Warming and promote energy independence.

Paulsen voted:
NO to Minnesota's participation in a regional greenhouse gas reduction program. [1]
NO to requiring that 20 percent of Minnesota's energy be produced from renewable sources by 2020. [2]
NO to requiring that renewable energy make up a minimum share of the electricity sold by utilities. [3]

In announcing his Energy Plan on August 8th, Paulsen focused almost exclusively on developing renewable energy.

It is clear that Erik Paulsen will NOT follow in the footsteps of Congressman Ramstad. Here’s why…

The people of the Third Congressional District have supported Congressman Ramstad because of his moderate positions on social issues. Do you really expect them to veer to the far-right now?

Erik Paulsen’s track record:

Accepted $107,000 from Corporate PACs, after previously proposing to ban PAC contributions.
http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/can_give/H8MN03077

Supports “Drill Here, Drill Now” as part of his energy policy.

The fact that Ashwin volunteered to join the United States Marine Corps after attending law school says a lot about his character. As a young lawyer, primed for a high paying position at a top law firm, he could have opted for the money. But instead, he became a Marine, and spent 4 years serving our country proudly. For that, he deserves our gratitude.

Ashwin Madia is emphatic that we must change our economic policy in this country. The era of “borrow and spend”, ushered in by the Bush Administration must end. The Congress must return to the basic financial concept of “pay as you go”, meaning that every spending proposal must be matched to specific revenue sources or spending cuts. This method was instrumental in creating a federal budget surplus in the late 1990s.

Erik Paulsen has consistently sided with Big Oil to oppose tough measures to fight Global Warming and promote energy independence.

Paulsen voted:
NO to Minnesota's participation in a regional greenhouse gas reduction program. [1]
NO to requiring that 20 percent of Minnesota's energy be produced from renewable sources by 2020. [2]
NO to requiring that renewable energy make up a minimum share of the electricity sold by utilities. [3]

In announcing his Energy Plan on August 8th, Paulsen focused almost exclusively on developing renewable energy.